Which massage movement should be avoided when using indirect high frequency?

When using indirect high frequency techniques, tapotement should be avoided because this massage movement involves rhythmic and percussive motions, typically applied with the hands or fingers. Tapotement can create a stimulating effect that may interfere with the subtle effects produced by indirect high frequency treatment. The nature of tapotement can lead to excess stimulation of the skin and underlying tissues, which is counterproductive when the goal is to enhance relaxation and deeper penetration of high-frequency currents.

In contrast, movements like petrissage, circular friction, and effleurage are generally smoother and more continuous in nature, promoting relaxation and improving circulation, which can support the intended outcomes of high-frequency usage. The choice to avoid tapotement aligns with the need to create a soothing environment that complements the effects of high frequency rather than distracts from or counters them.